Among its aims, the rule certainly seems bent on goals like rectification, recompense and reform, but indirectly. Ill-Fitting Theory Over-Generalizing Rules of Thumb Despite its assets, there are further reasons to think that the general theory project is inappropriate for many ethical rationales, the golden rule being perhaps chief among them.
Choosing is usually endorsing and expressing a want, whether or not it expresses a preference among desired objects. These considerations provide the needed boundary line to situate the golden rule this side of a feasibility-idealism divide.
Such is the case with Kantian and Utilitarian super-principles. Still, the distinction between principles and rules may not be as sharp as claimed. Their morally relevant qualities cannot compete in importance with our other personal features.
Alan Gewirth has proposed a rule in which we focus on mutual respect for our generic rights alone. Second, we find that people do not generally ask much, especially when they see you at risk of being taken advantage of for your exceptional good will. We are to treat humanity, whether in ourselves or others, as an end in itself and of infinite value.
To abuse-counselors and homeless shelter workers, this goes without saying. Treat others as you would choose to be treated in the established social role you each occupy and its legitimate expectations, mother, father, or teacher to children and vice versa, spouses and friends to each other, peer co-workers, supervisor to rank-and-file employees and vice versa, and so forth.
But the most salient psychological features of virtuous traits fade into the amoral background once the principled source of their moral relevance and legitimacy is redefined.
As Aristotelians note, the good for anything depends on its type or species: But it neither addresses the wrong being committed, nor that part of the perpetrator to be faulted and held accountable. Once our heart goes out to others, following its spontaneous pull hardly requires going the extra foot, much less a mile in effort for anyone.
The mere act of thinking about how your actions affect others changes your life. Given that we may not be loving enough to ourselves, loving our neighbor is best accomplished by referring to prevailing standards. This is a strongly egalitarian message. Doing so might well be masochistic, or even egotistical, thinking about our own character development most, thereby exacerbating crime and endangering the community.
Additional good results from family and friendship institutions when members treat each other as special, and especially well. This is a tricky phrase. It is not clear that generalizing self-love captures appropriate other-love. Unlike every other ethic, agape provides no basis for according ourselves special first-person discretion or privacy.
Children in agapeistic communities are often raised by the adults as a whole, and in separate quarters from parents, primarily inhabited by peers. Normally we interpret the golden rule as telling us how to act.
Throughout his ethical works and essays on religion, however, Kant speaks of philanthropy, kindness, and generosity in praising terms without giving like credit to self-interest.
Are they friend, stranger, or opponent. It brought social inclusivity to center stage, thus shifting the focus of Jewish ethics generally. From the Bible, Leviticus More, Confucius himself made the golden rule an unrivaled centerpiece of his philosophy of life The Analects, This classism was a source of conflict between Confucianism and Taoismwhere the lowest of the low were often depicted as spiritual exemplars.
Cannot be a sole guide to action[ edit ] In his book How to Make Good Decisions and Be Right All the Timephilosopher Iain King has argued that " although the idea of mirroring your treatment of others with their treatment of you is very widespread indeed… most ancient wisdoms express this negatively — advice on what you should not do, rather than what you should.
Subtle pressures will be felt to conform with this group norm, and subtle sanctions will apply to those who take more than they give. The most obvious ethical implication of agape is that it is not socially discriminating. Jan 10, · Golden Rule Another prominent principle is the Golden Rule which states that “Do unto others as you would have others to do unto you” which has been applied and referenced in the business literature (Mattingly, ).5/5.
The Golden Rule is the principle of treating others as one's self would wish to be treated. It is a maxim that is found in many religions and cultures. The Golden Rule can be considered an ethic of reciprocity in some religions, although other religions treat it differently.
The golden rule requires that we treat others only as we consent to being treated in the same situation. GR is the most important principle in this book and perhaps the most important rule of life.
The Golden Rule. The most familiar version of the Golden Rule says, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Moral philosophy has barely taken notice of the golden rule in its own terms despite the rule’s prominence in commonsense ethics. Ethics Why the Golden Rule Must Be Practiced in Business “Each time you live up to the Golden Rule, Grow Your Business at Entrepreneur LIVE!
Join us on Nov.
16 in Brooklyn, NY, to learn. The Golden Rule. The most familiar version of the Golden Rule says, “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Moral philosophy has barely taken notice of the golden rule in its own terms despite the rule’s prominence in commonsense ethics.Ethics golden rule